get back | keep going

23 Skidoo

  • May. 20th, 2007 at 6:21 PM
pathwork, totoro, hush, travelogue, narrative, blonde swedes artsy, bear and bird, blonde swedes duo, blonde swedes acoustic, transform, tart, raven, blonde swedes smile, private, child, gentleness, process, mythic, blonde swedes studio, cartoon, tech dorkbot, playtime, love, ho ho ho, blonde swedes action, scanner face
You know, it occurs to me that the phrase "like a broken record" really doesn't have much meaning for kids raised in the era after vinyl. "Like a skipping CD" doesn't mean the same thing either as CDs tend to skip ahead or skip around and, anyway, don't reliably skip back and play the same piece of the song over and over. Perhaps the popularity of old school rappers and folks like Beck might at least keep the idea of record scratch around.

In fact, "like a broken record" makes me feel the same way as saying "beating a dead horse" or "like a bad penny" does. Kids today don't know from horses and one day soon the penny will be out of circulation. And that will leave me with my adages, which I'll spew forth our the window of my dank apartment at the kids on the lawn.

So what skips? A stone across the water? Do people do that anymore, or has that gone the way of feeding the ducks? Are there still ducks? "Like somebody keeps hitting the Tivo rewind" might work. Maybe "Like an acid loop". I dunno. I'm still working on it.

Nevertheless, here I am back with the same thoughts that I've had before. But that's okay. Each time I revisit the same place, I come to it with a new understanding and a better grip.

Thing is, when I'm not feeling quite like myself, I've found that I write things as if I'm playing myself in a movie or on stage. I know the way I talk and the way I think and express myself, and I even know what I'd expect out of me were I to see somebody perform as me. As a side note, my attempts recently to expel Gerald Depardieu as the top pick of who would play me in a movie and replace him with John Corbett is not going that well. Depardieu is more than a fine actor, but who wants to look enough like him so that he is constantly picked to play you?

Maggie Gyllenhaal, Jason Schwarztman, Holly Hunter… rrrrawr! Gerald Depardieu? Can I at least get a John Cusack again? Used to always be John Cusack. What happened?

But where was I? Yes, when I'm not feeling quite like myself, I find myself acting as if. The concept of act as if works well for social situations, gives me a great deal of ability to remove myself from bad turns and sadness. But I don't think it has a place in my writing. I feel disingenuous, but more to the point, I feel like I'm not capturing my mood at the moment, like I'm blocking my emotion by subverting it into a channel that is consistent with how I view myself as a writer and how I think others view me. I say what the Me-player should be saying instead of what I want to say. Or, if I can't do that, I just remain quiet and say nothing.

I've realized this weekend that I never have writer's blocks. I have writer's squeezes. It's like my own fist is clenching down on my flowy mind and squeezing harder and harder so that something always gets out, but what gets out might be a small trickle compared to what is being held back. It ebbs and flows, depending on many factors and stresses in my life, always letting some measure out, never strong enough to close the fist.

I don't mind the control or rather the selective choice of expression when it is applied to structured works, writing on an essay or piece of fiction when I feel moved to do so, or when the piece itself is wanting to be explored. I don't mind not writing on those things when I feel fallow or when I've had a very eye-strainy kinda day, or when I'm not feeling well or when I only have 15 minutes before bed and am half asleep.

But what I mind is feeling like my feelings can shut off all writing. And that's what I've been doing in many ways.

When I started this journal, it was to have a place to blather. This is a Live Journal. It's not professional, won't make my writing career, has no purpose other than to share and to witness and to connect. It's a page online amongst millions of pages online. It doesn't matter at all. It has no purpose other than what I decide it's purpose is. It's never going to be a place where other people can really be exposed to what I have to say, apart from my community and my friends.

But when this place is the only place, it has to have every purpose. It's like being in a relationship and having no friends, expecting your partner to provide everything for you that you seek from connection. It's claustrophobic and dysfunctional and you end up resenting it in the end as much as you end up clinging to it desperately.

One of my first conversations with [info]imtboo was how her journal was a place to clear the swamp. But if you don't have any plans for the swamp once it is cleared, the exercise become a bit tiresome. "Why does this swamp have to be cleared everyday," you might ask of the heavens, and eventually you might just decide to stop showing up for work, because maybe the swamp just wants to be left alone.

And so I return, again for the dozenth time, to the idea that I really need to be spending energy on external, structured, sharable writing projects at the same time that I'm posting the cobwebs and the jingling and the shiny bits and the shadows here. I need both approaches running simultaneously in order to be functioning from a good creative place. And I need to return to a post a day, even if that post is one paragraph with a bunch of words that make no sense. If that's what I'm feeling, that's what I want to be writing. Otherwise, the swamp just gets too full of branches and junk and alligator wrappings and I can't find the lost civilizations for all the leeches and brackish sinkholes.

But more to the point, I don't want to write anymore as if. And I mean in anything. That's not speaking or living my truth and it makes me feel like a charlatan. And there's a big difference between a trickster and a quack. What I'd like to do instead is write from honesty and see where what I'm writing belongs. I'd guess most often, it belongs here, which really should be the default. But it's only in writing through that things emerge that also belong other places, as well of the emergence of what kinds of things those other places want to be fed.

And that's where I am today. I'm also using words like "charlatan" and "quack", so I might as well be using "shenanigans". Does anyone else really know what these things mean? Am I the only one still using those words in normal conversation? I feel like I'm 130 years old here.

I'm going to go and drink my ovaltine.

Comments

[info]drshorn wrote:
May. 21st, 2007 06:30 pm (UTC)
Fantastic post! I like the swamp bit especially.

Don't worry, man! You aren't old until you start carrying Werthers around in your pockets. :)

You . . . . aren't carrying Werthers around in your pockets, right?
[info]bwb_archive wrote:
May. 21st, 2007 10:34 pm (UTC)
No, I'm just glad to see you.

And thanks
[info]outintexas wrote:
May. 22nd, 2007 05:53 am (UTC)
Oh, you need a Werthers? Here, I have some in my pockets somewhere...

(rummaging around)

[info]outintexas wrote:
May. 21st, 2007 10:16 pm (UTC)
I loved this entry, and have so many comments I don't even know where to start. I guess I'll just say that Lanora and I were just talking about anachronistic idioms in language (starting with "Dialing the phone" ... when was the last time you saw a phone with a dial on it?), and how old we're feeling.

And for the record, even though it's beside the point, your 'as if' character may not be genuine, but he's still quite talented :-) And I think we all have that character within us. We all become slightly different people depending upon our audience. Sometimes it's actively fake, most more often than not, it's just like there's a "personality equalizer", and sometimes you pump up the bass a little, and sometimes you slide the sliders for the treble up. It's all genuine, just a different mix.

And if the South Park kids can use the word "shenanigans", then I think pretty much anyone can, without having to feel old or anachronistic while doing it :-)

[info]bwb_archive wrote:
May. 21st, 2007 10:40 pm (UTC)
Thanks, buddy.

I liked WRITING this post, which is something of a new thing for me. The challenge for me is speaking my truth at all times, which means that I need places to just sit with a banjo without any bass or treble, unless it comes naturally. And the next phase of my life is learning (I have a good start) to go out into the world with less and less of any pumping or altering. Just truth.

Now of course there are many, many social situation, and in fact a plethora of creative outlets where I will want to be a certain way or speak a certain way, or just not show up if I am not feeling like I can engage without forcing it too much. Lots of adjusting and altering there. But my creative problem has been that I don't have a place where I can just not have to do any work other than be exactly who I am. That's this place, and it's something I keep forgetting, because I don't have many OTHER places around at the moment.

It's a good reminder, and the only way to really make it stick is to write here every day, regardless of mood, to show myself that I can just flow sometimes without reason and leave the reason to other avenues.

Thanks, too.

Does anyone use 'Plethora" anymore, or is that just me?

[info]outintexas wrote:
May. 22nd, 2007 02:22 am (UTC)
Seriously. I use 'plethora' all the time. I also use 'penultimate' ... and even use it correctly. Of course, there aren't a ton of situations that call for the use of 'penultimate', but still, I manage to weasel one in every once in a while.

I even use the word 'weasel' as a verb. In spite of the protests by the WADS organization (Weasel Anti-Defamation Society). Screw 'em if they can't take a joke.

BTW, I've spent much of my life putting someone else out there instead of the real me, because at times, it wasn't safe for the real me to be there. I understood this even as a kid, and hid my flame from view. It's a very old, very hard habit to break, and there are far too many times I put an actor in charge, acting as if, acting as expected, and sometimes I'm not even aware of it. Though most of the time I'm all too aware of it. It's second nature, and a lifetime of threatened violence makes it a difficult conditioning to break.

Thank god I have good and accepting friends around whom I can ignore all that nonsense, and continue the journey of finding out exactly who I really am, as well as accepting the fact that who I really am is 'okay' in spite of continual messages from society to the contrary.
[info]bwb_archive wrote:
May. 22nd, 2007 04:09 am (UTC)
Yeah, well heard, this. And I used to do this a lot in my life probably up until the time I left Columbus for Seattle in 1997. I was also thinking that I should clarify here. I feel like over 90 percent of the time in my life, I'm speaking and living my truth. But when it comes to creativity, I still seek the safety of the known sometimes.

I know how to write as me. I'm so good at it, that I can write as me when I don't feel the emotion behind what I'm writing, almost like a writing assignment... Write as William on this subject. And that's not really what I want a journal to be about.

Also, when I start saving up "pieces" (okay, I can write an entry about that and structure it that way. And then I can write an entry about that and structure it that way...), I know that I'm missing the more structured channels and trying to make this be all and have all.

And really, nobody and nowhere is enough for all.
[info]outintexas wrote:
May. 22nd, 2007 05:51 am (UTC)
Yeah, I totally understand you. (And my problem with saving up 'pieces' is that I never actually get around to putting them down... I still have a huge piece in my head that is now so woefully out of date that it's pointless to even try posting it now)

Good look and all that. I, for one, will be looking forward to a daily wag :-)
[info]markdascot wrote:
May. 21st, 2007 11:32 pm (UTC)
Very interesting entry my friend. As usual, you've given me reason to think, and I thank you.

Keep in mind as you clean out your swamp, that all serve a purpose. Even "leeches and brackish sinkholes" have their given place and time.

On a side note. I finally found time today to write a short post, which I did. Afterwards I started reading all the other new ones. I get to this one and smile. I wrote about lying. You wrote about truth.
[info]bwb_archive wrote:
May. 22nd, 2007 04:19 am (UTC)
You know, I really love swamps. I do. Lots of great birdlife in swamps for instance... And The Swamp is where I met a bear once.

So maybe what I should say instead of "cleaning out the swamp" is that I want to "write the swamp", because it has to be written and until I write it every day or every so often, I can't get through it to write what's on the other side.

That's more a positive spin than the imagery of throwing things away is. So thanks.
[info]markdascot wrote:
May. 22nd, 2007 04:11 pm (UTC)
I liked your response about "saving up pieces." It hit home actually. I've found myself thinking of things to say, going over in my head how to say it, and before you know it, instead of really free form thought, I've started writing bits or song lyrics again. When I wrote lyrics I wrote to pull emotion, to go for a "hook." I'd like to try just writing.

You know Mr BlackWingedBoy, you really are wise beyond your years. Which I find amazing considering how old you are. (runs like a bear out of you know where )
[info]bwb_archive wrote:
May. 23rd, 2007 06:35 am (UTC)
Thank you. As an anthropomorphical avatar, you'd be surprised how old I am.

I don't look a day over 3000 too.